Sometimes, it isn't
enough for the body to be satisfied with the pleasure s this world has to
offer. I believe that as you achieve satisfaction and delight, the more it will
haunt, the more the body would respond in wanting for more. A feeling where the
motivation factor is no longer the need but the excitement it brings whenever
the act transpires.
But I also believe
in the law of diminishing effect, that as you get to the hang of a certain act,
doing it over and over again, the satisfaction and pleasure somehow bounces
back not to a higher degree of want or need but it somehow tries to subside. Like
a basketball left dribbling on its own until the ball suddenly comes to a halt,
unless a hand would propel and tap to get it bouncing one more time.
I was thinking that
these two thoughts above are somewhat contradicting to each other. And I was
torn in trying to reconcile for both to meet halfway in order for me to draw
the line in extracting the applicable anti-dote for each.
To reverse the
essence of the law of diminishing
effect, would it be hypothetical to note in keeping the pace as slow as
possible? So as to prolong the need or want. I guess it could somehow
contribute, but could it also be the case by keeping the salt as effective as
it was for it negate the lost of taste?
As for the first
thought, I'm trying to decipher which creates a greater impact, would it be the
sender of the act? Or the receiver of the act? Who could greatly sustain or
intensify the need for the act to get it going further? And further… until it
will come to such a point that the act is already transitioning to the second
thought - the law of diminishing effect.
Could this be true
in the name of love?
Or would this apply
only to the physical sense of being a human?
MAC