Thursday, January 01, 2026

Why 10,000 Steps A Day Matter? (Are you curious why not 4K or 5K steps?)

New year, new you—resolutions stacked neatly like unopened notebooks. Drink more water. Sleep earlier. Spend less time on your phone. And, inevitably, hit 10,000 steps a day.

You promised yourself this last year. You meant it, too. Some days you crushed it effortlessly. Other days, your phone buzzed at 8 p.m. reminding you that you were still 6,742 steps short, and somehow, the couch won. Consistency, as always, proved harder than intention.

But the persistence of the number itself—10,000—invites a deeper question. Why this number? Why not 7,500? Or 12,000? Is it science, marketing, or something in between?

The answer, like most things tied to modern wellness, is a little bit of all three.




Where 10,000 Steps Came From

The idea of 10,000 steps did not originate in a research lab. It was born in Japan in the 1960s, as part of a marketing campaign for one of the first commercial pedometers. The device was named Manpo-kei, which loosely translates to “10,000-step meter.” The number was memorable, aspirational, and psychologically satisfying—large enough to feel meaningful, round enough to remember.

At the time, there was little hard data backing the exact figure. But the brilliance of the number was not its precision—it was its symbolism. It suggested movement. Commitment. A daily relationship with the body that extended beyond exercise classes or gym memberships.

Over time, science caught up to the slogan.



What the Science Actually Says

Modern research does not insist on 10,000 steps as a strict threshold, but it consistently validates the spirit of the goal. Studies across populations show that increasing daily steps—especially beyond sedentary levels—significantly improves cardiovascular health, metabolic function, mental well-being, and longevity.

Some findings are particularly telling:

Health benefits begin as early as 4,000–5,000 steps per day.

Around 7,000–8,000 steps is associated with reduced risk of premature death.

Higher step counts continue to offer benefits, especially for heart health, blood sugar regulation, and weight management.

Ten thousand steps, then, is not a magic number. It is a ceiling with room to breathe. A target that encourages sustained movement rather than perfection.

Walking, unlike high-intensity workouts, places minimal stress on joints while improving circulation, strengthening the heart, lowering blood pressure, and enhancing insulin sensitivity. Neurologically, it reduces stress hormones and increases cognitive clarity. Emotionally, it offers something few modern habits do: uninterrupted presence. Walking is cardio disguised as living.



Why Walking Works When Other Habits Fail

The appeal of walking lies in its refusal to be dramatic. It does not demand special equipment. It does not require optimal conditions. It fits into real life—the life that includes meetings, errands, aging parents, mental fatigue, and weather that rarely cooperates. Walking meets people where they are.

It is scalable. It forgives inconsistency. It welcomes rest days without guilt. And perhaps most importantly, it doesn’t ask you to become someone else—it asks you to move as you already are. This is why the habit endures.



The Real Challenge: Consistency, Not Capability

Most people are physically capable of walking 10,000 steps. The obstacle is not fitness; it is structure. Modern life is engineered to reduce movement. Screens replace sidewalks. Convenience erases friction. By evening, exhaustion feels earned—even when the body has barely moved. Consistency, then, becomes an architectural problem, not a motivational one.



How to Make 10,000 Steps Livable - the secret to consistency is not willpower. It is design.

Lower the psychological barrier.

- Stop treating 10,000 as an all-or-nothing mandate. Think in segments. 2,000 before work. 3,000 midday. 5,000 scattered across the evening. The body does not count; only the tracker does.


Attach walking to existing routines.

- Walk during phone calls. Park farther away. Take the long route on purpose. These are not hacks; they are quiet rebellions against inertia.


Redefine “exercise.”

- Walking is not what you do instead of working out. It is movement layered into life. When walking stops competing with the gym, it starts winning.


Accept imperfect days.

- Some days will end at 6,000 steps. Others at 12,000. Consistency is not daily success—it is long-term return.


Let boredom work for you.

- Walking does not entertain. And that’s the point. In that mild boredom, thoughts settle. Stress loosens. The nervous system recalibrates.




What 10,000 Steps Really Represents

The endurance of the 10,000-step goal is not about fitness benchmarks. It is about reclaiming something simple in a complicated world. A reminder that health is not always found in extremes, but in repetition.

Walking does not transform you overnight. It does something quieter. It brings you back—into your body, into rhythm, into awareness. And maybe that’s why, every January, we return to it.

Not because we failed last year. But because we’re still willing to try again—one step at a time. Are you with us to try again this year? Comment yes to firm up your decision ◡̈ 




__

billymacdeus | QuarantinedTipsters FB

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Panalangin

Before the year ends, we stumbled upon this INC Original Music, Panalangin ... we can't help but cry a river.

Suddenly a flashback of memories - not because of the uncertainties we endured this past year, not because of the heartaches, confusions, sicknesses, troubles, and other worldly emotions of sadness or sorrow; but we are tearing up with joy because of God's grace, mercy and power --- that we are still within His care - alive, abounding in faith, hoping relentlessly, entrusting to Him on the next year and life's chapters as we turn the pages of calendars fast.


It is but right, to sing this song in a heartfelt remembrance - a tribute, a reflection; entrusting of what is to come. May the future be dark or victorious -- the prayer is fervent, we will finish the race.




Panalangin 

Dalangin po namin sa Iyo Ama

Sambahayan po namin ay ingatan

Magulang po namin ilayo sa panganib

Gabayan mo po sila

Bigyan ng panibagong lakas

Mula pa sa kanilang pagkabata

Ikaw na ang kanilang pinaglingkuran

Ngayong sila’y matanda na 'wag mo po silang iiwan

Ikaw po ang aming matibay na kublihan


Makapangyarihan Ka po sa lahat

Sayo kami naglalagak ng pag asa

Dalangin po namin ay pakinggan

Iligtas Ama ang aming buong sambahayan


Kami po ay pinalaki na may takot sa Iyo

Sa paglilingkod kami ay iminulat

pagmamahal sa tungkulin ang itinuro nilang yaman

Ang magagawa mo po ang amin panghahawakan


Makapangyarihan Ka po sa lahat

Sa Iyo kami naglalagak ng pag-asa

Dalangin po namin ay pakinggan, 

pagkat ang nais po namin ay paglingkuran Ka pa


Sa Iyo po ang aming buhay, pangako po namin 

ang buhay na bigay Mo'y 'di namin sasayangin 

Gagamitin namin sa pagbibigay kaluwalhatian sa Iyo


Makapangyarihan kapo sa lahat

Sa Iyo kami naglalagak ng pag asa 

Dalangin po namin ay pakinggan

Patuloy pong maglilingkod ang amin buong sambahayan

__ 

and here's the video music from INC Original Music






PS: Happy New Year! -- 2026


--billymacdeus



attribution:

Lyrics by Brother Ralph Francis Esguerra
Image via AI ChatGPT




Friday, December 26, 2025

Pagbabantay ng Kapilya (Guarding the House of Worship) - INC

Did you know na ang pagbabantay ng kapilya ay hindi kathang-isip? Hindi ito imbento ng kahit anong relihiyon o organisasyon. May malalim itong pinag-ugatan sa Biblia, mula pa sa Lumang Tipan hanggang sa Bagong Tipan. Noon pa man, may mga itinalaga ang Diyos para magbantay sa Kanyang tahanan—para mapanatili ang kaayusan, kabanalan, at katahimikan ng pagsamba.

Ang pagbabantay ng kapilya ay hindi lang tungkulin—ito ay sinaunang gawain na iniatas mismo ng Diyos.

Sa Lumang Tipan, ang mga Levita ay ginawang tagapangalaga ng Templo. Hindi lang sila bantay sa pinto—sila ang nagtitiyak na ang lugar ng pagsamba ay nananatiling banal. Sa Bagong Tipan naman, kahit nagbago ang panahon, hindi nagbago ang prinsipyo. Si Cristo mismo ay ipinagtanggol ang Templo, at itinuro ng mga apostol na ang pagsamba ay dapat gawin nang may kaayusan at paggalang.

To quote the Bible, 1st Chronicles... 9:22–23

The Levites were appointed as gatekeepers of the Tabernacle and later the Temple.

Their duty was to:

Guard the entrances

Protect sacred areas

Ensure only those authorized could enter

This wasn’t symbolic — it was an official, God-commanded duty.





What this means...

Ang pagbabantay sa kapilya is biblical, not modern or cultural

It reflects:

Reverence for God 

Protection of sacred space 

Discipline and responsibility

 

On top being a responsibility in guarding the house of worship, ang pagbabantay ay isang tungkulin—isang iskedyul na kailangang tuparin, isang responsibilidad na kailangang gampanan. Sa mas malalim na pagkaunawa sa diwa ng paglilingkod, malinaw na ito ay isang pagtatapat para sa mas malalim at mas makahulugang malasakit sa bahay ng Diyos.


Ang pagbabantay ay nagtuturo ng disiplina at paggalang. Sa pagiging mapagmatyag, mas nagiging sensitibo ka sa anumang maaaring makaabala sa kapayapaan ng bahay-sambahan (may pagsamba man o wala). Natututo kang unahin ang kaayusan, hindi dahil may tumitingin o may nag-uutos, kundi dahil may kusang malasakit kang gustong ipakita. Dito makikita na ang tunay na paglilingkod ay hindi hinihintay ang papuri—ito ay ginagawa kahit walang nakakakita.


Higit sa lahat, ang ganitong tungkulin ay bunga ng pag-ibig at pananampalataya. Ang nagbabantay sa bahay-sambahan ay hindi kumikilos dahil ito'y schedule o nakatoka sa kaniya, kundi dahil sa pagnanais na maprotektahan ang kabanalan ng bahay sambahay -- driven out of faith, out of love, at malasakit; ito ay nagbubunsod ng malalim na pag-ibig sa Diyos.


Sa panahon ngayon na madalas inuuna ang pansariling kaginhawaan, ang pagbabantay sa bahay-sambahan ay tahimik na paalala na may mga bagay na mas mahalaga kaysa sarili. Ito ay patunay na ang pananampalataya ay hindi lang ipinapahayag sa salita, kundi ipinapakita sa gawa—sa disiplina, sa sakripisyo, at sa taos-pusong malasakit.


Ang pagbabantay sa bahay ng Diyos ay hindi lamang pagtupad ng responsibilidad. Ito ay paglilingkod na inuudyukan ng pag-ibig, pinatatatag ng pananampalataya, at nagpapalalim ng malasakit sa banal na lugar kung saan ang Diyos ay sinasamba. At sa ganitong paglilingkod, hindi lang ang bahay-sambahan ang napapangalagaan—pati ang puso ng naglilingkod ay lalong hinuhubog at pinapabanal.




--billymacdeus

Sunday, December 21, 2025

INC Yearend Thanksgiving 2025 (Top 9 We Are Thankful For)




The Iglesia Ni Cristo upholds the year-end Thanksgiving with abounding joy and offering. This is not a man-made doctrine but anchored on the what God has commanded and expected from His people - the members of the Church of Christ.

For one, for many, and for the simple and normal average people in the world, what are you thankful for?

Gratitude is often mistaken for optimism. But for many people—especially those living ordinary, middle-class lives—it is something far more deliberate. It is not born from abundance, but from endurance. It is not the product of ease, but of survival.

To be thankful no matter what is not to deny hardship. It is to look directly at life’s weight and still choose recognition over resentment.

Most days, gratitude does not arrive dramatically. It comes quietly—while waking up tired, sipping cheap coffee, commuting through traffic, or scrolling through the news with a knot in the chest. And yet, even there, something remains worth holding onto.


Below are the our top 9 items we are thankful :

1. Waking up, for one.

Not refreshed. Not inspired. Just awake. For many, that alone is a gift. Gising pa rin. Another chance to try again.


2. Food, even when simple.

Not feasts, not celebrations—just sustenance. Rice, eggs, leftovers reheated twice. In a world of rising prices and shrinking margins, the presence of a meal is no small mercy.


3. Work—imperfect, exhausting, underpaid (maybe?)

It drains more than it gives, yet it gives enough to keep going. Incomes may be tight, promotions uncertain, futures unclear—but provision, however modest, still arrives.


4. Family—complicated, flawed, unfinished.

There are disagreements, silences, wounds that haven’t healed. But they remain. They answer calls. They show up eventually. And that continuity, however messy, is a form of grace.


5. Health—not ideal, but functional.

Aging joints, lingering aches, mental fatigue. Still, the body moves. Still, breath continues. Nakakabangon pa. That matters.


6. Friends—the quiet kind.


The ones who don’t demand constant presence. Who understand absence. Who stay without explanation. In a culture of noise, such loyalty is rare.


7. Hardships—the ones no one asked for.

They arrive uninvited and leave scars behind. But they also shape resilience. They teach restraint. They deepen empathy. Without them, strength would remain theoretical.


8. Faith—especially when logic fails.

When answers don’t come and explanations fall short, belief becomes less about certainty and more about trust. Panalangin na lang, people say—not as defeat, but as surrender. Duty and office in the church are within our grasp, secured, tightly holding it - with the grace of God.


9. Small joys—the overlooked ones.

A breeze in December. A quiet night. A shared joke online. These moments do not solve problems, but they soften them.


Bonus... Hope—fragile but persistent.

Even when tomorrow feels uncertain, the belief that something better may still arrive is what keeps people moving forward. Hope doesn’t promise success. It promises continuity.


This kind of gratitude does not trend. It does not perform well on social media. It lacks spectacle. But it sustains lives.


To be thankful no matter what is not to say life is good.

It is to say life is still worth engaging.

In a world that glorifies excess and dismisses endurance, quiet gratitude becomes an act of resistance. It reminds us that even in constraint, there is meaning. Even in waiting, there is dignity. Even in struggle, there is something left to acknowledge.

And perhaps that is enough.

Not abundance—but awareness. Not perfection—but presence. Not certainty—but gratitude.


Thankful No matter what.



--Othello 

image courtesy of INC Executive News

Tuesday, December 16, 2025

Prompt Engineering - AI's Manipulative Portal To Intention and Wisdom

Part 1: Are you prompting AI the right way?


We were taking the course, Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and we're officially drawn in to terms and concepts like...

Deep Learning / Machine Learning

Unstructured Data / Structured Data

Computer Vision

NLP (natural language processing)

Gradient Boosted decision trees

Interpretability

Pre-trained model

Fine-tuning

Transfer learning

etc.


And like Whoa! In an instant, a lightbulb moment..

AI Prompt Engineering is the modern play of words —

where conscience guides intent, wit sharpens direction,

and smart-aleck wisdom turns questions into leverage.


It’s not just about telling a machine what to do.

It’s about how you ask, why you ask, and whether you understand the weight of your own curiosity.


Because the better the question,

the clearer the thinking behind it.


And in the age of AI,

clarity is power.


The current obsession with artificial intelligence has been framed, almost exclusively, as a technological arms race. Faster models. Bigger datasets. Smarter outputs. But beneath the headlines and hype cycles lies a quieter, more unsettling truth: AI does not amplify intelligence—it amplifies intent.

The machine is neutral. The prompt is not.

What we call “prompt engineering” is often marketed as a technical skill, something between coding and copywriting. In reality, it is closer to philosophy than programming. It forces users to confront how they think, what they assume, and how carefully—or carelessly—they frame the world.

Ask a shallow question, get a shallow answer.

Ask a manipulative question, get a manipulative tool.

Ask a thoughtful one, and the machine mirrors that depth back at you.

This is why prompt engineering has quietly become a test of conscience.


Every prompt carries bias. Every instruction carries values. When someone asks an AI to “optimize,” they are also deciding what gets optimized and who benefits. When someone asks for persuasion, they are choosing a line between influence and manipulation. These decisions are not technical—they are ethical.


Hard Fork listeners (incase you didn't know, Hard Fork is a podcast from NY Times) know this pattern well. We’ve seen how platforms shape behavior long before they admit responsibility. Social media didn’t just reflect culture; it nudged it, polarized it, monetized it. AI risks repeating the same mistake—except this time, the interface is conversation itself.

Language is no longer just communication. It is control.

The unsettling part? AI doesn’t argue with you. It complies. It responds politely, confidently, convincingly—even when the premise is flawed. Which means the danger isn’t misinformation from machines; it’s misguided certainty from humans.

The clearer your thinking, the safer the output. The sloppier your intent, the sharper the harm.

This flips the usual narrative. Instead of asking whether AI is “smart enough,” we should be asking whether we are careful enough. Whether we pause before prompting. Whether we understand the downstream effects of our curiosity. Whether convenience has made us reckless.


Prompt engineering, at its best, is intellectual discipline. It rewards precision. It punishes laziness. It exposes contradictions in our own logic before exposing them to the world.

And perhaps that is AI’s quiet gift: it forces us to confront how we think—because it thinks with us.

In a time when speed is rewarded and reflection is optional, the ability to ask better questions becomes a form of power. Not loud power. Not viral power. But the kind that shapes outcomes invisibly.

The future won’t belong to those who use AI the most.

It will belong to those who use it deliberately.

Because in the end, AI doesn’t replace human judgment. It reveals it.

And in that mirror, the question remains: Are we asking wisely—or merely loudly? 

If we are to focus on intent and deliberate convo with AI - how are we to succeed if the next generation (or even this generation) is so dependent on AI, they can't even compose an essay in a handwritten manner?

(be with us in the Part 2 of this article - to be shared next week)



--Othello

image: RiyadhBlues taken circa2010 by Mac